Contact

Draft Value Analytics covers the full landscape of fantasy draft strategy — from auction value principles to dynasty framework mechanics to the statistical underpinnings of value over replacement player. This page explains how to get in touch, what to include in a message, and what kinds of requests this property is best positioned to handle.

Additional contact options

The primary contact method for Draft Value Analytics is the email form hosted on this domain. For general questions about site content — methodology questions, clarifications on a specific framework, or feedback on a published analysis — that form is the right starting point.

For questions that fall into more specific categories, a few other paths are worth knowing:

1. Content corrections or factual disputes — If a published figure, citation, or analytical claim appears to be in error, flag it directly with a note identifying the specific page, the claim in question, and the source that contradicts it. Corrections are taken seriously and reviewed against named public sources before any update.
2. Framework methodology questions — Questions about how a particular model works — say, how positional scarcity metrics get calculated, or the logic behind draft position equity analysis — are best sent with as much specificity as possible. "How does this number get generated?" lands better than "I'm confused about the math."
3. Licensing or republication requests — Any request to reuse, adapt, or republish original analytical content from this property should come through the main contact form and be clearly labeled as a licensing inquiry.
4. Partnership or collaboration inquiries — These are reviewed periodically, not on a rolling daily basis. Response times for partnership requests typically run longer than for content questions.

How to reach this office

The contact form on this domain is the single point of entry for all inbound messages. There is no public phone line associated with Draft Value Analytics. There is no support ticket system. The form is the mechanism.

Messages sent through the form are reviewed by the editorial team that maintains this property. That team is small — which is, honestly, part of why the analytical output tends to be coherent rather than a patchwork of competing voices. The tradeoff is that response times vary depending on volume and the complexity of what's being asked.

For simple content questions or corrections, responses typically come within 3 to 5 business days. For partnership or licensing inquiries, the window is closer to 10 to 14 business days. If a message hasn't received a reply after 14 business days, resending it once with "Follow-up" in the subject line is reasonable.

Service area covered

Draft Value Analytics covers fantasy sports drafting strategy at a national scope within the United States. The analytical frameworks published here apply across the major fantasy platforms operating in the US market — including ESPN, Yahoo, Sleeper, NFL.com, and Underdog — though this property is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by any of those platforms.

Sport coverage spans the 4 major North American professional leagues — NFL, NBA, MLB, and NHL — with NFL fantasy content representing the deepest analytical layer. College football fantasy formats, including college football draft value, are also covered. Daily fantasy sports strategy is addressed in comparative context through DFS vs. season-long value, though this property is not a DFS picks service and does not publish weekly lineup advice.

Geographic scope: content is written for US-based fantasy participants. Formats, scoring conventions, and platform references reflect US market standards. International fantasy leagues using different platform structures may find that specific platform mechanics differ from examples used here.

What to include in your message

A good message gets a useful response. A vague message tends to generate clarifying questions, which slows everything down for both parties. Here's what actually helps:

For content questions:
- The specific page title or URL where the question originated
- The exact claim, framework, or figure in question
- What specifically is unclear or appears incorrect

For corrections:
- The page and the specific passage
- The named public source that contradicts the published claim (a source like a NIST document, a league official ruling, or a platform's published scoring rules — not a Reddit thread)
- Whether the correction is factual (a number is wrong) or interpretive (the framing seems off)

For republication or licensing:
- What content is being requested
- Where it would appear (publication name, URL, estimated audience size)
- Whether the intended use is commercial or editorial

For partnership inquiries:
- A brief description of the organization and what the collaboration would involve
- Whether the request is for co-branded content, data sharing, affiliate arrangement, or something else
- A relevant contact name and title

One thing that doesn't need to be included: apologies for length or explanations of why the message was written. Just the substance. A message that opens with "I have a question about the surplus value drafting framework — specifically, how VORP thresholds get applied in PPR formats" is more useful than one that spends two sentences explaining that the sender is a fantasy player who was browsing the site.

The goal is to make every piece of content on this property as accurate and analytically sound as possible. Feedback that serves that goal — including disagreement — is genuinely useful.